Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I felt similar amazement at Gödel's proof, and even suspect that Penrose must be on to something when he says the mind must therefore not be computable. . . . But the book Gödel's Theorem: An Incomplete Guide to its Use and Abuse by Törkel Franzén is very good at explaining that the conclusions we should draw are fairly limited, e.g. that the proof doesn't apply to anything other than arithmetic. I'm not sure I'm totally convinced, but it's a great perspective to dispel some of the more mystical interpretations.


Dennet also has a pretty good take down of Penrose in chapter 15 of Darwins Dangerous Idea.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: