> You arbitrarily claim to be able to make accurate assertions of reality
Nope.
> while at the same time agreeing that the essence of reality is unknowable.
Yep. I guess? All I think is that it's okay if we don't know the true essence; science is still useful[0].
> Stop using the word good without making your case for righteousness.
Stop hijacking common words.
> You can't substitute it with practical or useful either, both infer benefit at the personal degree.
I don't know what that means.
> Just because an expectation proved to be useful once, remember that the past does not predict the future.
Depends what you mean by predict the future. Absolute truth? No. Useful[0] forecasts? Yes.
----
[0] dictionary.reference.com:
> useful: being of use or service; serving some purpose; advantageous, helpful, or of good effect
> You arbitrarily claim to be able to make accurate assertions of reality
Nope.
> while at the same time agreeing that the essence of reality is unknowable.
Yep. I guess? All I think is that it's okay if we don't know the true essence; science is still useful[0].
> Stop using the word good without making your case for righteousness.
Stop hijacking common words.
> You can't substitute it with practical or useful either, both infer benefit at the personal degree.
I don't know what that means.
> Just because an expectation proved to be useful once, remember that the past does not predict the future.
Depends what you mean by predict the future. Absolute truth? No. Useful[0] forecasts? Yes.
----
[0] dictionary.reference.com:
> useful: being of use or service; serving some purpose; advantageous, helpful, or of good effect