Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I'm coming at this from more of a physics viewpoint than from CPSC. To me, parallel programming is all about dividing a big problem into many little ones. The meat therefore lies in boundary conditions. I don't have time to read this pdf right now, but it contains just two instances of the word "boundary". That sets off alarm bells for me.


Your alarm bells are calibrated for physics, it makes sense they would false alarm on a different subject.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: