Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I don't get it.

Everyone is gushing about the post-pc era, Eric Schmidt announced a few days ago that Microsoft is irrelevant, and the article takes for granted that Microsoft and PC as we know it will survive for next 20 years, and Windows will be dominant platform on PC?

If history teach us anything, it's that there's always some solution for the problem. If Windows 8 marketplace turns to be too restrictive, game developers will turn to Steam on Linux. And with enough gamers on Linux, Asus or Gigabyte will not be pressed to make only "compatible with Windows 8" UEFI-locked motherboards.

Or the consumers (and the gamers) will find Win8 marketplace acceptable. Or maybe in five or ten years some other player will sweep the market.

Looking at the current technology and lamenting about the end of the world is just plain stupid.



Yeah. This is the "extrapolate one technology, ignore everything else and base your future on that" syndrome.

Star Trek did that with spaceships and AI. You can explore the galaxy way past lightspeed, but your computer can't put up the shields to save your life unless your captain yells "Shields!". Right.


To be fair (and a pedant) that was for the sake of melodrama. The computers exploded in a shower of sparks during battle for the same reason. Rule of cool.


I think the captain even had to yell "Shields up".


> If Windows 8 marketplace turns to be too restrictive, game developers will turn to Steam on Linux.

Absolutely. I think this is the implication of the article.

> Looking at the current technology and lamenting about the end of the world is just plain stupid.

I didn't sense any "lamenting about the end of the world" -- rather the end of the status quo, where the 2011 GOTY was packaged exclusively for the most recent Windows platform.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: