I think it’s possible to create value and therefore profits without externalizing costs upon the public.
Personal responsibility is not all or nothing, and some of it belongs with wise voting. As experts are concerned, that can mean experts in regulation which is fine. Currently that’s often conflated with industry insider experts which is a mistake and the root of a lot of this corruption. Police prove that approach is unnecessary, there are many fine drug detectives for example that were never involved in the illicit drug trade.
Personal responsibility is not all or nothing, and some of it belongs with wise voting.
Isn't voting giving up personal responsibility to unknown electorate? Also your wise voting is easily conter by anyone who don't care.
How experts of all kind fields could possible compete in predatory environment where only experts in politics win? Whole system doesn't make any sense.
Personal responsibility is not all or nothing, and some of it belongs with wise voting. As experts are concerned, that can mean experts in regulation which is fine. Currently that’s often conflated with industry insider experts which is a mistake and the root of a lot of this corruption. Police prove that approach is unnecessary, there are many fine drug detectives for example that were never involved in the illicit drug trade.