Some of the founding fathers were, yes. There are real problems with the maintainability of that model, of course.
This is way, somewhat famously, Noam Chomsky considers his anarchism a straightforward extension of the principles of enlightenment political philosophy to industrial society.
There's a layered irony, of course: most of the founding fathers were members of a political and economic elite which openly favored aristocracy and commerce over the 'regular folk.' Not all of them of course. The American Revolution was a strange tenuous cooperation between an economic elite that saw independence as the way out of a mercantile demand on the part of Britain, and a political class which was versed in Enlightenment political philosophy and saw an opportunity for using Locke and Montesquieu as a handbook for a new kind of government.
The irony is that as best I gather, the founding fathers were shooting for much the same! (Federalism)
(Of course that was states rather than small towns or something, but states were far less populous then- and Rhode Island is still pretty small!)