Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Most power generation facilities are natural gas fired, using large aero derivitive gas turbine engines (essentially the same engine that is in the 747 - LM6000 vs CF6 for example) with a combined cycle steam turbine to capture the energy from excess heat. This arrangement has a thermodynamic efficiency of 60%. Even with electrical transmission losses, the efficiency is still far better (1.7X) than having the power plant located under the hood of the car.


Not to mention, policing one large facility for compliance with emissions is much easier than trying to monitor every single one of millions of cars on the road.


It's much easier to regulate millions of nobodies with no power than it is to regulate a single wealthy donor.


Even with a car, you aren’t necessarily regulating millions of individuals - primarily just manufacturers. I suppose there is the odd case where “old joe” removed his catalytic converter and is polluting more than others but that is probably rare.

I don’t get your point on centralization however - more efficient but less robust (just like in software).


Correction - I do get your point


For necessarily centralized industries like car manufacturing the regulations are written to protect the wealthy incumbents competition more than to protect consumers.


Also, methane produces less carbon for the same amount of energy as larger hydrocarbons like gasoline and diesel.




Consider applying for YC's Summer 2026 batch! Applications are open till May 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: