Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Well, they ain't paying tax for fuel, roads have to be fixed for something...


Fuel excises do not get allocated directly to some kind of "road budget", they go into general revene. Almost all of it can be accounted for in corresponding fuel tax credits, three quarters of which go to mining companies. From memory the difference in 2019 census was like 100mil, so 7.8billion came in from fuel excise, 7.7billion went back out in fuel tax credits.

In essence, everyone pays for federal roads, road user or not, and municipalities pay for local roads. Except for larger state funded projects, which often receive federal assistance. Fuel taxes are a trivial component to infrastructure upkeep, is my understanding.

Another myth is that vehicle registration pays for roads, vehicle registration goes entirely to running the vehicle registration apparatus, that's all.


In 2021-22, fuel tax raised $18.2 billion, of which $6.89 billion (38%) was returned as fuel tax credits. https://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Parliamentary_depart...


Oh I was way off, I doubt 2019 was much different. I'll adjust my parent comment.


> “Fuel taxes are a trivial component to infrastructure upkeep, is my understanding.”

If that’s true, Australia needs to think about raising its fuel/vehicle taxes!

In the UK, the opposite is true: direct fuel and vehicle taxes raise 3-4X more revenue than is spent on roads annually[1]

[1] In 2021/22, £11.8 billion was spent on UK local and national roads, vs £28 billion raised from fuel duty and £7.1 billion from vehicle excise duty.


The point is that people using are paying that. We dont have fuel tax credit here (Poland) so

> 7.8billion came in from fuel excise, 7.7billion went back out in fuel tax credits.

just seems like pointless excercise in bureaucracy...




Consider applying for YC's Summer 2026 batch! Applications are open till May 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: