This is just generic speculation about how the issue could be political. Yes, if someone is influencing governments to say chloresterol is bad because they benefit from a related drug/procedure - that _would_ be political.
However, all we have so far is baseless speculation. You are yet to provide any evidence to support any of the claims that:
- Kendrick's ideas are political in any other way (not imaginations about how they could be political with no evidence)
- The poster of the AfD has a political bias against Kendrick (ex. they support anti-chloresterol lobbyists)
Unfortunately, this discussion is looking more and more like those I've had with conspiracy theorists, so I assume any future posts you make still won't contain any proof of these claims - please prove me wrong.
However, all we have so far is baseless speculation. You are yet to provide any evidence to support any of the claims that:
- Anti-chloresterol lobbying/bribery/influence exists
- Kendrick's ideas are political in any other way (not imaginations about how they could be political with no evidence)
- The poster of the AfD has a political bias against Kendrick (ex. they support anti-chloresterol lobbyists)
Unfortunately, this discussion is looking more and more like those I've had with conspiracy theorists, so I assume any future posts you make still won't contain any proof of these claims - please prove me wrong.