Branches.. revisions.. being ran through a legal interpreter to ensure there are no logical errors.
There is a movement for plain english bills, which the average user(citizen) could read. I'm for that too.
SB 1101
Legislation failed self consistency checks against:
HB 1203, SB 32
Renders sections in statute redundant:
33.401, section A 31.22, section D
Renders sections in statute moot:
31.101, all sections. 32.4, section B
Gaps in enforcement found (loop holes)
SB 1101 Section A, has incomplete coverage of peoples...
HB 7075
That's the normal law creation workflow (nearly everywhere, for a century or so already). They don't use automated tools, but the features are there.
Life isn't software engineering where anyone can just contribute. I literally had a conversation today with someone that thought Common Law was "Christian Law" and then called me Dumb when I explained where that didn't really make any sense.
Only when people know enough to enforce it?
That's kind of how the law works in all scenarios.
There are so many skeletons in the closets, however most are unenforceable because there is more reasonable precedent in the other direction.
If nothing else, I'd like to see a lot of law refactored into human readable language while keeping its meaning.
Branches.. revisions.. being ran through a legal interpreter to ensure there are no logical errors.
There is a movement for plain english bills, which the average user(citizen) could read. I'm for that too.