The notion of Chromely not needing Node to run and may not even be needed for development should count for some difference and less use of resources, methinks.
Worse if you consider Electron.NET, you have to run a separate Asp.net server besides Node.
These are differences that made me conclude, yes, it is somewhat "lightweight" or simpler compared to them.
To me these are the advantages Chromely brings to the table.
The notion of Chromely not needing Node to run and may not even be needed for development should count for some difference and less use of resources, methinks.
Worse if you consider Electron.NET, you have to run a separate Asp.net server besides Node.
These are differences that made me conclude, yes, it is somewhat "lightweight" or simpler compared to them.
To me these are the advantages Chromely brings to the table.
I appreciate the feedbacks.