> A new Distributed Proof of Work (DPoW) backed blockchain that is immune to centralization because of a unified client/miner with only one miner allowed per person, linked anonymously to a HUID.
The whole blockchain thing is built on the assumption that we don't have this HUID thing which solves Sybil attacks. Now that Sybil attacks are no longer a concern, surely there must be a more efficient algorithm than PoW to secure the chain.
> This ID is not centrally controlled, which will virtually eliminate all Sybil attacks, along with the vast majority of problems in peer to peer networks.
It's trivial to stop Sybil attacks in a centralized system... Making the ID decentralized certainly does not help in that department.
> A HUID generated through the intersection of revocable biometrics and cryptography.
Aren't biometrics (and by extension, identities) trivial to generate?
The whole blockchain thing is built on the assumption that we don't have this HUID thing which solves Sybil attacks. Now that Sybil attacks are no longer a concern, surely there must be a more efficient algorithm than PoW to secure the chain.
> This ID is not centrally controlled, which will virtually eliminate all Sybil attacks, along with the vast majority of problems in peer to peer networks.
It's trivial to stop Sybil attacks in a centralized system... Making the ID decentralized certainly does not help in that department.
> A HUID generated through the intersection of revocable biometrics and cryptography.
Aren't biometrics (and by extension, identities) trivial to generate?