ChatGPT is a joke for this. Any interesting/funny topics result into a judgmental response and refusal.
I asked to write a 100-words first message for a Tinder match who had "very talkative" in their bio. ChatGPT kept saying how it would be rude of me to send such message and both the other person. FFS.
It's awful but who sends these kids to work? What will a mother of 3 children do if she can't feed herself?
It's a terrible cycle but it takes ages to fix. No foreign company is benefitting from Bangladeshi kids making low-quality bricks for their village. What is the solution today? If you tell them they can't work, who will feed them today?
Are you personally going to donate your money to not only feed all these people, build schools and infrastructure, but also $20/hour to everyone involved in the process?
Cool points for child labor yo. So because people are in terrible situations, I should actively seek that out to exploit it? Man, these kids have no other choice, better get my cheap labor while I can! Why not even free labor if possible?[1]
Same arguments were used for slave labor. How are they going to take care of themselves? Might as well just keep them as slaves. What are we going to do, pay them?
Child labor has been used by just about every major fashion brand in the world, not just to "make bricks for their village"... If that's the extent of what you think child labor is, might want to check out some books or do some googling. Here's just one to get you started: [2].
Africa would be much more profitable for America if they developed like Japan and China have. Before colonialism they were a prehistoric continent in many places. It was in many cases evil. But I’d didn’t make them poor or backward
The point of bringing jobs to Kenya is that they can pay less. If you don't see that as a benefit, why should I, a business, go to the trouble of working with a Kenyan company rather than just do it locally?
I could pay a Kenyan $17 an hour, or I could pay a Kansan instead and get US government benefits. The same applies at every payment level. Your logic fails the moment you realize that not every person/worker on earth is equal.
Insisting on this sort of articles just goes to show how sheltered these offended people are. I live in the third world and I know people who are thankful to Coca Cola for their "$2 wages."
Do you think then, that they deserve to be mentally scarred without any support and paid less than the minimum wage for a receptionist, on the basis that they are not "equal" to us?
Sure, if the number of power users is low, not increasing, and these power users drive a lot of engagement. I suspect that at least one of the above is not true.
Also you should rethink your life if you consider yourself a Twitter/Reddit power user.
All that looks good on paper, but a lot of apps require full disk access and can easily run in the background, so how "trustable" can that really be in practice?
With iOS at least I know that apps really are sandboxed and cannot access anything unless I grant permission. No app can ever attempt to access my photos unless I explicitly pick a photo or grant partial/total access. Even then it's read-only or "write with confirmation, every time"
Well both of your complaints were already addressed. Android introduced the scoped storage system to remove and fix abuse of "full" disk access, and they also added the foreground notification system which forces a system notification to be displayed if any app is doing work in the background, so that you know about.
Right, but if the average real-world Android experience lags behind say iOS in terms of security, then the point, even if outdated, still serves to disprove the parent’s premise that AOSP is the most secure.
On GrapheneOS you can choose specifc storage scopes, even if the app is requesting full user storage access.
And you can deny the file access permission like any normal permission, most modern apps request music or videos and photos, rarley an app requests full file access.
On release, IE6 was so ahead on CSS standards conformance it broke websites. The old (long-forgotten) incantation for accessing XMLHttpRequest is the way you create a COM IDispatchEx object by ProgID from inside Active Scripting, because that was the way it worked in the original IE implementation. Before there were PWAs or Electron, there was the HTA, introduced with IE5. (Admittedly XUL came even earlier.) And so on—those are not exceptions.
It’s just that once Microsoft won the web, it turned out what they wanted to do with it as the main competitor to their fat-client business was nothing, so the IE team was effectively dissolved and IE stagnated, leaving an opportunity for Firefox to displace it. But before that happened, they innovated like crazy, up to and including (by some accounts) a right to demand features they needed from the Windows team—and, on the other hand, writing the original implementations for others: multilingual UI, a Unicode layer for 9x, windowless ActiveX controls, new revisions of the common controls, etc.
So you’re right that Chrome is not the new IE of 2009: Chrome is the new IE of 1999. And unlike Microsoft back then, Google now seem perfectly happy to fund the hamster wheel if it means every other prospective browser is also forced to run inside it or lose users.
Google won the web years ago and it's still "innovating." By "is the new IE" people generally mean the 2007 IE, not the 1999 IE. I don’t think many complained about those shiny new ActiveX APIs in IE 3 and Chrome doesn't really have anything like that (even though they push features out with few signals from the rest of the platform)
Chrome already won, non-Apple users basically don't have a choice.
Please tell me how Chrome has "slowed down" after reaching the current market share years ago. It's not like Safari is the one making on-spec progress like Firefox did in 2005. Sounds like you're the one not understanding the early browser wars.
Anyone who disagrees hasn't tried to develop a website on Chrome and Firefox only to find out Safari still doesn't support regex lookbehind (which means zero javascript will now run). It's only been available in Chrome for 5 years after all, no rush.
None of your Jacascript code will run? That sounds overly dramatic.
1. this only concerns regex 2. there’s an alternative regex syntax doing the same thing as part of the ecma standard 3. it can be implemented very easily without regex in almost all cases 3. It seems like you’re only considering chrome for desktop, not other browsers or mobile
The original iPhone, and many versions after it, was probably 4 times smaller than the current phone.
Even on the current large iPhone screen the dropdown lists (instead of scroll wheels) are usually a pain to navigate because they are often a much smaller target and don't allow mistakes (you mis-click on an item, you have to open the dropdown again)
I've been using Safari for years now and I still think it's poor in many areas.
URL autocompletion is an absolute joke. Detaching tabs has been browser-crashingly-bad for about a year. Still no way to tell whether the current page has already been bookmarked. Performance is pitiful on large pages (e.g. long PRs on GitHub) to the point typing is takes whole seconds longer. Pointless "apps" for web extensions, which make it unnecessarily complex for non-Apple developers to publish web extensions for Safari.
I only use it because it's not Google’s and because it integrates better than Firefox. If I didn't have an iPhone I would never think of using Safari on Mac.
I asked to write a 100-words first message for a Tinder match who had "very talkative" in their bio. ChatGPT kept saying how it would be rude of me to send such message and both the other person. FFS.