Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | ajwaxman's commentslogin

Quite the nice surprise to see this hit the front page after getting back from a long road trip that included explosive diarrhea from our son on the last pitstop

Love seeing all the other personal apps people are building


Ha amazing! Brings back memories of holding our sleeping son and voice to texting with Claude on pat leave


I write on a variety of topics: health, product, design, and engineering. Need to get back to writing more frequently https://blog.awaxman.com/


That's a great list of product design resources [1]. If you were to pick just 3, which would those be?

1. https://blog.awaxman.com/product-design-resources


Not when you have a footer that you want people to be able to click. Can't stand when infinite scrolls make footers impossible to interact with!


Maybe when presented with such an unfortunate design you may be able to search the items for a nonsensical search term, resulting 0 items in the list. Then, the footer should be visible.



Credit to Jason Fung (author of The Obesity Code) for the tips!

And I can very much relate to not being able to stop once I start eating something. I find this especially hard with processed/refined carbs, which I believe play some tricks on our hunger related hormones so our body can't detect when we've had enough food. If I stick to mostly more protein/fat and unprocessed carbs I find it much easier to control how much I eat.

It's interesting to hear your success with an extended fast. I haven't ventured beyond the 16:8 but am intrigued to experiment with something a bit longer this year.


Has anybody ever used stack ranking to power book recommendations? Instead of rating books on a scale of 1-5 star you instead rate each book relative to every other book you’ve ever read.

Some other factors that I think could be used to create a high quality book recommendation engine on top of stack ranking: number of books read (the top 5 books from someone who has read 200+ books is a stronger signal than someone who has read 10 books) and release date (give extra weight to older books to reduce recency bias).

What do you think? Am I onto something or just spewing some sat night nonsense?


Are all books comparable linearly like this though? I could see separate stack ranks for different genres (practical books, sci-fi, relationships, whatever), attributes (readability, teachability if applicable, subject matter interest), or more.

I also can't help but think in graphs, so I could also see horizontal-ish linkages between the stacks as well. Each book, then, could have a number of attributes that get an independent stack ranking for each one, leaving you with a constellation score as well as a focused look at what the book is good at or focused on. I could see it getting unwieldy though.

Thinking through this, maybe genre stacks based on some collapse of attribute ranking scores.


I think this could work, although perhaps in combination, not replacement, with the traditional ranking system. The book on the bottom of somebody’s list isn’t necessarily a bad one.


Anyone else misread that as new Patrick Collison math?


I came here to say this.


Just hit my 60th weekday in a row of writing at least 350 words thanks to Blurt

Here's some more details on creating this habit. On blurt of course :)

https://blurt.app/@awaxman11/creating-a-writing-habit/5c60ed...


I've been really enjoying Blurt app http://Blurt.app

Here's a behind the scenes look into how I've used Blurt to help me create a writing habit (50+ day streak ongoing!) https://blurt.app/@awaxman11/creating-a-writing-habit/5c60ed...

The founder is running the business openly.Here are his Feb '19 results: https://twitter.com/corey_gwin/status/1109565231510900736


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: