Sure, and the parent comment's position is that they dislike it. Its purpose is to advocate against clickbait titles becoming normalized in the scientific community.
The model should perform better with JSON prompts than with natural language prompts. The safety filter may also be triggered incorrectly by natural language prompts, we are aware of this and will make a future checkpoint update to improve it.
I am filing an EB1-A petition with a law firm. The law firm says that based on their recent experience, EB1-A cases that have requested Premium Processing (PP) have a lower approval rate and a higher RFE rate.
While the statistic may be true, is there a causation between PP and RFE/denial or is it just that cases created in a rush with PP might simply get more RFE or denial?
With all due respect, the firm's data is 100% anecdotal and I would say meaningless. There's no reliable data on this question since there's no control studies (and can't be) on the relative merits of filing EB1As with or without premium processing. We file 99% of our EB1As with premium processing because most of our clients don't want to wait 6 months to hear back from USCIS.
https://mastodon.social/@tristanbuckmaster/11723341370570119...
And here are Terence Tao’s comments on the results: https://mathstodon.xyz/@tao/117233527638291447