Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | NoMoreNicksLeft's commentslogin

My password manager's browser integration breaks on every update of Firefox, which seems like it is a weekly affair. I got rid of the extension, and copy/paste everything.

Password managers were never meant to solve the problem of phishing, and aren't really capable of that. They solved the problem of password reuse. They do that just fine.


The age of internet search is over. The age of Cloudflare has begun. It wouldn't be possible to build a search engine now if they wanted to... and there wouldn't be anything to search for anyway. The non-corporate internet withered into dust and blew away in the wind.

If you could find what you want, how would they ever sell you what they want you to buy? And I'm not just talking merchandise, though that too. Your political narratives, your values, opinions, everything. And everyone likes it so much they just sit there scrolling and swiping and tapping.


I'm hoping for a future where we create static HTML pages again styled with a bit of handmade CSS, because we're so tired of bot attacks and long loading times. Then suddenly a Cloudflare network becomes absolet.

people have been putting their fuckass blogs with 0.5 visitors a day behind Cloudflare long before the increase in bot traffic. and that increase makes fuck all any difference for them anyway.

Cloudflare is quite easy to bypass.

Do you have a source for this claim? Cloudflare gives me endless captchas on almost any website.

Yes, I bought a cheap residential proxy service and used it to scrape a site.

Ironic that I'd need something like that to stop getting blocked from a residential IP

It's probably cheaper to switch your ISP to one that your target site does not block, than to pay someone else to buy that connection and proxy all your traffic through them.

Sorry, I don't consider that a bypass, or easy.

Using a real browser is also easy.

I have tried many, many, many browsers across multiple OSes and different hardware, and they all give me endless captchas.

Firefox, Waterfox, Iceweasel, Icecat, Seamonkey, LibreWolf, Pale Moon, Mullvad, Tor Browser

Chromium, ungoogled-chromium, Google Chrome, Edge, Brave, Falkon, qutebrowser

Safari, GNOME Web, Konqueror

No difference.

I am 100% certain it has nothing to do with my browser.


I think curated directories from prehistory might make a comeback eventually, maybe combined with a search engine that indexes only the whitelisted websites. ironically, we can use LLMs to filter out AI slop by measuring the signal-to-noise ratio, which is atrocious for AI slop and ESL slop that preceded it.

You can stream your own stuff, from home, to all of your devices and your friends' devices, for free. And since the movies are on your own hardware, you have them forever. Movies, tv, music, books, comic books, video game roms, basically any sort of media you can even name. And it's been possible for you to do so for the last 15 years, maybe more.

>And I'll bet that flying first class today is far better than 50 years ago.

I wasn't flying first class 50 years ago, but everything I can see now leads me to believe that this isn't even slightly true. There might be a high def flatscreen in front of me in first class today, but I'm not getting more attention than someone would've gotten back then, I'm not in a less crowded airport while I'm boarding, and the security mess is more demeaning than ever.

The only reason that people aren't rioting for all the changes is that no one even remembers how good it used to be.


If you want to know what flying first-class 50 years ago was like (and you live in southern California, and you have money to burn) you can try the Panam Experience (https://panamexperience.com/). It's a replica of a Panam 747, together with a "crew" in period-correct costumes, that tries to recreate the entire experience of flying in the 1950s. (Bearing in mind that the plane is a replica, located on a soundstage.)

That sounds a bit weird, the 747 didn't enter commercial service until 1970.

A 1950s flight experience would have been on something with piston engines and propellors, like a DC-6 or a Super Constellation. Noisy, turbulent, and not particularly safe by modern standards.


I flew in piston airliners long ago. They fly low and slow, and barf bags are supplied for a reason (low altitude means lots of turbulence).

Today's airliners fly high where the air is smooth, they've gotten very good at avoiding turbulent weather, and there are automated damping systems. The barf bags are still there, but I've never seen anyone use one.

The cool thing about piston airliners, though, is the the engine start.


I have flown in turboprops, which start just like a jet engine. Yes I bet the startup of a big Pratt & Whitney Twin Wasp or Wright Cyclone, belching smoke and fire would have been something to see.

A turboprop is a jet engine :-)

Today's high bypass jet engines also qualify as a turboprop.

The sound of a Merlin V12 coughing into life is just pure joy. My dad had the best job in the world flying P-51s (powered by Merlins). I hired a P-51 to do a flyby at his funeral. I only had to pay for the gas.


That's because the 1950s were seventy years ago, not fifty, which only brings you back to the 1970s.

Ah, I responded to "tries to recreate the entire experience of flying in the 1950s" and not the "50 years ago" yes in the 1970s it could certainly have been a 747.

> no one even remembers how good it used to be.

Because not that many people even used to fly. Because it cost a lot more.


Economy are seats getting smaller, but also modern airplanes are much fuel efficient.

"Between 1950 and 2018, efficiency per passenger grew from 0.4 to 8.2 RPK per kg of CO2"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fuel_economy_in_aircraft

https://www.explore.com/1762212/reason-why-plane-experience-...


Well that and the people who make decisions largely don't fly peasant. Remember that the US air force is mostly executive transport.

The easiest way to make conditions get better is to make sure the people in charge have to use things, be it busses, bike lanes, trains, airports, public bathrooms, parks with bums, etc. Otherwise it always hits the middle and lower class to absorb it.


What immigration problem? Immigrants are wonderful. Things have only improved in Germany with immigration. It is wrong and unethical to keep immigrants out of your country, you have no right to do so.

what?

why can't I then migrate to the US or whatever country I wanna go to?


The US has one immigration system for honest law-following people (Visas, green cards, etc.) and a second system for people who don't follow rules (walk in from Mexico, overstay a Visa, etc.)

What leverage would you have to enforce the will of the vote on those that control things?

When I use the VPN, I am connecting to an endpoint that 40 other people are also connected to. Did I download that file, or did one of the other 39 download it? Even the VPN provider can't tell... they keep no logs. I wouldn't want to use the VPN to phone in some bomb threat, that wouldn't even hide me 5 minutes from the feebs, but it's like an impenetrable shield for copyright troll lawyers. Smooth sailing for the last 13 or 14 years, for $3/month.

I'd be shocked if anyone in the United States is still downloading stuff without a VPN. There are entire countries that don't have to worry about it, but none in Europe or North America where that is the case.


You do realize many VPN providers are run by intelligence contractors. =3


And?

Are they going to commit treason and start snitching on me to Hollywood lawyers for shits and giggles? How would that play out do you think?


It is not treason if it is a foreign group operating on foreign soil.

This was an old Quid pro quo arrangement that predates the Patriot act.

Have a nice day =3


And what do you think the Hollywood lawyers would have to offer in return for such favors? Looks pretty low-value from both sides. Maybe I need to dial up my narcissism a few notches to understand you, I'm just not that important enough to the folks who have the anti-vpn superpowers.

If only we could open source it and load it onto the phone with Sideloadly.


I think that quite often it has more to do with making sure the missiles and drones can't easily hit their targets. Not that this is an excuse for jackasses doing it just for shits and giggles. Fuck those people.


Narrow columns leave more room for ads. Ads that aren't even slightly aligned with products you're interested in.


Now explain dictionaries.


Dictionaries in columns statistically reduce white space and thus reduce the page count.

Especially for the definitions that are very short, for example when they only reference a more preferred spelling or a more prominent word that has the exact meaning.


So multicolumn layout increases whitespace in newspapers but decreases it in dictionaries? Funny how it always does the exact thing needed to disprove whatever I say in this exact moment.


Well ok ... If a full width newspaper needs the whole sheet and you put columns to reduce the necessary whitespace, you would end with blank space that you can fill with more articles or ads.

You don't really want to reduce the number of sheets for your newspaper because size of the newspaper is an indicator of quality. But trimming off maybe 10% of a dictionary is worthwhile. Size of a dictionary is a quality indicator too, but the absolute production cost is more for a book so saving production costs is more pressing.


A pre-internet technology that needs more ads for products you're not even slightly interested in.


Scanability and limitations of layout technology from 100 years ago.


I wonder what you'll come up with for 21st century reprints of the Bible. Please don't say tradition.


That's easy. The columns have to be narrow enough that you can still read a full column of scripture while your éclair rests on the other half of the page. That's why a full-spread layout is referred to a "qautréclair."


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: